Bob Burge Draws The Line

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

In the summer of 1981 a boy runs across the floor of an auditorium toward a folding table. He is fifteen and he has come to this public school for one reason. Behind the table sits a man with a teacher’s patience and a newspaperman’s eyes. The sign over the booth reads Journalism. The boy tells him he transferred from the Christian school down the road to take this class and only this class. The man looks him over. He has seen eager boys before. He has also seen what becomes of them.

Bob Burge teaches journalism and English at Placer High School in Auburn, California, from 1973 to 2006. For thirty-eight years his voice carries over LeFebvre Stadium on Friday nights, the home of the Hillmen. He writes the town’s history in monthly columns for the local paper. He helps found a charity that buys the school its cameras and its scoreboard, and he chairs it for ten years. A man can read that record and call it small. A man can also read it as one long act of tying himself to a single place until the place cannot be told without him.

Before the classroom, Burge works the daily trade. He chases the stories a town runs on, the council meeting and the fire and the score. Then one night the desk sends him to a house. A man has killed himself inside it. Burge stands in the room. There is blood on the wall. The paper holds a rule that suicides do not run, so that no reader learns from the page how a neighbor found his exit. Burge carries the scene back to the office. He prints nothing. He has walked into the worst room of a stranger’s life and walked out with a thing he is not allowed to use and does not want to use. Soon he leaves the daily grind. He keeps the craft. He edits a local magazine for years and he teaches the young, rooms where the truth serves the living town instead of feeding on it.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argues in The Denial of Death that a culture hands each man a hero system, a set of rules that lets him feel his short life counts against the grave. The soldier earns the medal. The mother raises the children who outlast her. The scholar adds the footnote that survives him. Take the system away and the man stares at his own nothing. Burge builds his hero system out of a town and a craft. The local newspaperman keeps the community’s memory and pricks its conscience, and he earns his small immortality in the archive, the scoreboard, the boys he shapes, the voice in the box that a generation hears before it hears the anthem.

He keeps a plaque in his homeroom that says there’s more to life than increasing the pace.

The sacred value at the center of that system is judgment. Not the nerve to print. The nerve any sixteen-year-old can supply. Judgment is the decision of what runs under a man’s name and a town’s name, and what stays in the drawer.

The word travels across other systems and changes its meaning in each. To the trauma surgeon, judgment is the cut he does not make, the patient he closes and sends home to comfort care because opening him buys pain and no hours. To the infantry sergeant, judgment is the order to hold the line instead of taking the hill, men alive at dusk who might have been a citation. To the priest, judgment is the seal he keeps over a sin he hears once and carries to his grave. To the homicide detective, judgment is the case he can prove against the killer he knows and cannot touch. To the rabbinic posek, judgment is din, the ruling that falls with the law’s full weight on one question brought by one Jew. Each man holds something back, and the holding back is the heroism. Say the word to any of them and he hears his own trade. Burge hears the wall he did not print.

In the newspaper room Burge runs a strange school. He gives the students the paper and leaves them to it. He tells the staff, on the day young Luke Ford joins, that everyone has the right to strangle him at any time. He does not censor. Not the football favoritism piece that earns the boy a lineman’s arm around his throat. Not the softball story that names a losing coach. He critiques after the issue prints, never before. And he teaches libel until the boys monitor themselves, because a hero system needs both the nerve and the line, and the line is the harder thing to teach.

When the boy runs a betting book out of his classmates, Burge will not have it in his room. It is not good for you and your friends, he says, to learn to take advantage of each other. The man guards the room the way he guards his own name.

Then comes the test. The boy digs into a softball coach who has lost for years. The players blame the man. The boy has his story. The coach tells him he missed the spring week because he was seeking treatment for his dying son. The boy feels the pull of the trade against the pull of mercy. He kills the angle. He runs the losing record and leaves the dying son out of it. Later the coach tells him the piece was fair. The value has passed from the teacher to the student without a word of instruction. The boy has learned what to hold back.

When the boy leaves for Australia after graduation, Burge writes him two pages. The elder writes the younger. It is the laying on of hands inside the system, the master telling the apprentice the craft will hold him.

Two decades on, the two men are friends on a website. The boy is a man now with a site of his own and a long record of telling the truth about himself and others in ways the local newspaperman never had to weigh. He posts a link to one of his essays on Burge’s page. Burge reads it. Then Burge performs the same act he has practiced for fifty years. He decides what runs under his name. He unfriends the man and he blocks him.

From inside Burge’s hero system the block is no betrayal. It is the system working. The whole life is the practice of deciding what attaches to a man and a town, and the man who taught the line draws it. The student builds his own hero system out of the opposite material. Where Burge earns his immortality by tying himself to one place and printing only what serves it, the student earns his by exposing himself to the world and printing what a town keeps quiet. Both men love the truth. Both practice harm-minimization. They learn it in the same room. They part at the wall, because a hero system tells a man what to stand against, and two men can share a craft, a town, a teacher, and find no single wall to stand against together. Burge keeps his. The student goes looking for the rooms Burge spent his life deciding not to print.

Posted in Auburn, Journalism | Comments Off on Bob Burge Draws The Line

Chuck Evans and the Sacred Body

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

Spring comes late to Howell Mountain. Pacific Union College sits above the Napa fog, and in March 1980 the grass on the ball field still holds the cold past nine in the morning. I am thirteen. I came to America in June 1977, eleven years old, off the plane from Australia, and in three years on this mountain I have learned one thing about myself with no room for doubt. I cannot hit a softball. I swing and miss. I foul it off my own foot. The other boys watch me the way they watch a kid who will lose them the inning.

Chuck Evans runs the program. He coaches basketball and volleyball and golf, and he has built the athletics here from close to nothing. That morning he walks over and stands behind me and says little. He moves my hands down the bat. He tells me how to swing straight. He tells me to watch the ball onto the bat and to swing straight. Step, he says. Don’t lunge.

Later that day I come to the plate during recess and I hit the ball farther than I have hit anything. It carries and then it’s caught. I’m out, but my classmates turn to each other. “Wow,” one of them says. “What happened to Luke?”

What happened was Chuck Evans. To see what he did, you have to see what he holds sacred, and a sacred thing has no meaning outside the world that made it sacred.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argued in The Denial of Death that men build hero systems to outrun the knowledge that they die. A hero system hands a man a script. Honor these things, do these things, and your small life joins something the grave cannot reach. Becker thought every culture sells this same product under a different label, the feeling that a man counts in a scheme larger than his own flesh. Religion sells it. The nation sells it. So does the gym, and so does the ball field.

Chuck’s hero system has a name. He teaches exercise science at a Seventh-day Adventist college, and in that world the body carries a weight that most American gyms never set on it. Paul tells the Corinthians their bodies house the Holy Spirit. Ellen White (1827-1915) built a health message into the center of the faith, and out of it came Loma Linda and the vegetarian table and the long Adventist habit of treating diet and rest and exercise as duties owed to God rather than as private taste. The school down the hill teaches the whole man, mind and body and spirit, because the faith promises that God raises the body and does not discard it. A clumsy boy at the plate, then, holds something on loan from his Maker. The flesh has a design. Training honors the design. To stand behind a kid and fix his swing is to tend a temple, and the work counts because the One who issued the body will ask for an accounting of it.

This puts Chuck at a strange line, and the line tells you who he is. Adventism grew up wary of worldly ambition. The reward sits in the next life, not in a trophy case, and a faith that keeps the Sabbath against the whole calendar of American sport has reason to distrust the Saturday game and the roar of the crowd and the man who lives for the win. American athletics runs on the opposite engine. It crowns the victor. It keeps the record. It teaches a boy that he counts when he beats another boy. Chuck spends his career at the joint where these two systems grind against each other, and he has made a living smoothing the friction. He gives seminars on ethics in athletics. He sits on the Angwin Community Council. The man who reconciles two hero systems for a living must believe in both, and must believe that the body can serve God and still keep score, that competition can build a man rather than corrode him, that the coach answers to a higher official than the umpire.

Hold that word, fitness, and watch it change shape as it passes from his world into others, because the same word names a different god in each.

A Marine drill instructor uses the word and means a body hardened into a tool of the state. Fitness for him is the load carried, the mile run under fire, the readiness to kill and to keep his men alive. The body belongs to the Corps before it belongs to the man, and a soft body betrays the unit. His immortality runs through the flag and the brotherhood, and the recruit who breaks down on the third mile threatens both.

A competitive bodybuilder uses the same word and means symmetry under stage light. Fitness for him is the photographed peak, the line of the deltoid, the proof of will written on the surface where the judges can read it. He starves and dehydrates himself for one afternoon of display, and he calls the wreck of that afternoon health because the system he serves rewards the image and not the man inside it. His grab at immortality runs through the photo, the trophy, the body frozen at its best the day before it begins again to fade.

A Carthusian monk in his cell hears the word and flinches. The body for him is the lower self, the appetite that drags the soul down, the thing to be subdued by fast and silence and the cold floor at the hour of vigil. Fitness barely registers, and where it registers it tempts. He starves the flesh to feed the spirit, the reverse of the man on Howell Mountain who feeds the flesh to glorify its Maker. Both men kneel. They kneel at opposite altars.

A Silicon Valley biohacker says fitness and means a dashboard. Resting heart rate, sleep stages, glucose curves, the long bet against death itself. He does not want the resurrection of the body. He wants to never need one. He tracks his markers and swallows his compounds and chases the year when a man might stop dying, and his hero system makes the most literal grab at immortality of them all, a refusal to hand the body back at the end.

An aging ballerina uses the word and means line. Fitness for her is the held arabesque, the turnout, the body bent past its natural limit into grace, and the cruelty of her system shows in the calendar. Her temple decays on a schedule the monk and the coach can ignore. The thing she worships leaves her first.

The boy at the plate carries his own freight, and none of these men can read it. I had crossed an ocean and lost a country and learned that I was no good at the games American boys play, which on a small mountain campus is most of what a boy has. The diamond was a court where I kept losing. Chuck did not see a hopeless case, because his world holds no hopeless bodies. Every body answers to patient training, since every body comes from the same hand and goes back to it. He did not give me a pep talk. He moved my hands and told me to watch the ball, and the small mercy of that morning was theological before it was athletic. He treated a clumsy immigrant kid as a thing worth fixing, because in his system nothing made by God is past fixing.

Becker would point out the rest. A man wants to leave something the grave cannot take. Chuck holds no great record of his own that the world remembers. He has something better suited to his system. He has the bodies he trained and the men they grew into, and he has a swing he corrected on a cold morning forty-five years ago that the man who owns it still tells stories about. That is the coach’s immortality, and it runs through other people’s flesh. He fixed a thousand of these. Most of them he has forgotten. The work outlives the memory of the work.

I love talking sports with Chuck. I love it now the way I loved it then, and the love has the same root. For one morning a man who believed my body was worth his trouble took the trouble, and the ball carried, and the boys turned around. He thinks he taught me to hit. He taught me that someone was watching who did not think I was a lost cause. In his hero system, no one is.

Posted in PUC | Comments Off on Chuck Evans and the Sacred Body

The Boy Who Did the Right Things

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

The door of the Badzik home stays open to Luke Ford on the weekends from 1980-1984. He comes for a Friday and stays through Sunday, fed and housed and tolerated, a guest the family takes in without ceremony. Luke never returns the favor. His own home stays shut. He is ashamed of it, ashamed enough that he accepts years of hospitality and offers none, and the reason hangs over the friendship without ever reaching speech.

Doug Badzik (b. c. 1966) sits in the same ninth-grade classroom at Forest Lake Christian School. Both boys come out of Seventh-day Adventism. Doug is chubby. He is not a social star. He does the homework, keeps the rules, treats the strange intense boy beside him with patience, and moves through the year doing, as far as anyone can see, all the right things. Luke does the opposite of the right things.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argues in The Denial of Death (1973) that a man assembles his life to feel he counts, that he stands as an object of value against a universe that will erase him, and that what he builds might outlast his body. Becker calls the scheme that grants the feeling a hero system. To be a hero inside one is to earn the sense that a life carries weight death cannot cancel. A boy chooses, or backs into, the system that will grade him, and the grade becomes his sense of his own worth.

Two boys leave the same fold and pick opposite systems.

Luke builds his hero on words. He argues. He performs. He holds the floor with verve and conviction and the certainty that he is right, and the certainty does not wait on whether he is right. Doug builds his hero on reliability. He shows up. He prepares. He does the work and keeps his word and earns the slow trust that collects around a man others can count on. The talker and the steward. One courts attention. The other courts the quieter reward of the man people lean on when the load comes due.

In the summer of 1992 Luke, sick with chronic fatigue syndrome, tracks Doug down. Doug dreads the letter. He’s heard Luke is tracking everyone down and pleading for attention. Doug feels a responsibility to reply. He feels he should tell the truth. He gives the honest verdict. Luke Ford, he says, was an arrogant little turd who was always right regardless of whether he was right. Whatever his arguments lacked in substance he made up for in verve and raw rhetorical ability. Luke frequently seemed illogical.

Read the verdict from inside Doug’s hero system and it holds. There, substance ranks above performance, logic above heat, accuracy above force, and a boy who is always right regardless of whether he is right has committed the cardinal sin of the system, which is to take winning the argument for getting it correct. Read the same boy from inside his own hero system and the indictment turns to a résumé. Verve, raw rhetorical ability, the power to hold a room and bend it. The same traits draw a failing grade in one cosmos and high marks in the other. The boy does not change. The system that scores him does.

The word doing the work in Doug’s verdict is right, and the word splits the moment you carry it across a fence line. For the epidemiologist, right is the model the data confirm, the curve that holds, the call the later numbers vindicate. For the carpenter, right is true and square and plumb, the joint that closes with no gap and needs no shim. For the appellate lawyer, right is the claim a man asserts against the state, the entitlement the text protects. For the ship’s navigator, right is the heading that brings the hull to the harbor and not the rocks. For the Adventist who raised both boys, right is righteous, set straight with God, justified before the judgment. Each man says the word and means a different universe. Luke, always right, means none of these. He means the boy won.

Adventism trains a posture, and the posture survives the loss of the faith. The Adventist watches. He reads the signs, sees the catastrophe coming, holds himself ready for an end the careless world refuses to see. He treats the body as a charge to keep, the diet and the health a discipline rather than a pleasure, the flesh a thing to guard against the day. Doug walks out of the church and carries the posture into the world.

He becomes a physician. Then a physician of populations. By his own account he has led public health and biosurveillance organizations charged with protecting millions, run budgets in the tens of millions, directed teams of physicians and scientists, governed some of the largest stores of health data and biological material on earth, and stood as a senior advisor to Cabinet-level leaders through pandemic and crisis. He watches for the plague the careless world refuses to see. He holds the system ready for the end. The watchman left the church and kept the watch. The end of the world turned into a curve to flatten, the day no man knows into a continuity-of-operations plan, the coming judgment into enterprise risk. Becker might note the neatness of it. The immortality project moved from heaven to the institution, and the boy who did the right things found his transcendence in organizations built to outlast him and in people kept alive who will never learn his name.

The language of the mature hero is the language of the executive class. He speaks of mission alignment and accountability, of durable organizations that perform under pressure, of translating complex insight into clear guidance that lets a board decide, of driving long-term value. The diction stays dry by design. It is the prose of a man whose heroism hides inside systems that work, whose triumphs read as the absence of disaster, whose best days leave no headline because the thing he guarded against did not happen. The watchman’s reward is a quiet morning.

Luke came back in 1992 with his body failing, and the body is the coin Doug’s world holds sacred. The hero of words arrived broken in the one currency the hero of health and function and performance under pressure could read at a glance. Doug gave him the truth as his system saw it, and the truth was not kind. It was also not wrong. Doug did the right things and rose to guard millions. Luke did things and got the verdict.

Two boys leave one cocoon. One builds a hero out of words and conviction and the spotlight and carries the gift and the wound of it into a hard life. The other follows the rules, does the work, keeps the watch, and becomes a man others lean on under load. Luke is grateful he knew him. Becker holds that every man needs to feel he counts, and that he will spend his life proving it against the dark. Doug proved it by becoming a man the dark has to get past first.

Posted in Adventist | Comments Off on The Boy Who Did the Right Things

God Comes First, and Sports Comes Second

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

In the winter of 1980 the bus to Forest Lake Christian School leaves before sunrise and comes back after dark. The ride runs two hours each way. Luke Ford rides it in the cold, fourteen years old, pulled that summer out of the only world he has known. His father has lost the Seventh-day Adventist pulpit and moved the family to Auburn, forty-five minutes north of Sacramento, to run an evangelical foundation of his own. The boy fails Spanish and Algebra his first semester. He finishes the term with a 1.2. He thinks he hates the school. He hates the year.

Then a boy a grade ahead of him, and a stratosphere above him in standing, starts giving him rides.

Lane Van Howd (c. 1964-1981) lives a mile from the Ford family’s new home. He moves through a room without effort, always teasing, always laughing, lifting the mood of whoever stands near him, the first dark hair coming in above his lip. He skis. Girls find him worth looking at. He carries the certainty of a boy who has decided he knows better than the adults, and his world rewards the certainty rather than punishing it. He buys Luke cold drinks in the afternoons while they wait for his mother and study the new ski equipment in the Auburn shops. He is kind to a miserable stranger. Some good people come into a life and adopt the stray. Lane is one of them.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argues in The Denial of Death (1973) that a man builds his life to feel he counts, that he stands as an object of value in a universe of meaning, and that his contribution will outlast his body. Becker calls the scheme that grants this feeling a hero system. Every society codes one. To be a hero inside it is to earn the sense that a life carries weight death cannot cancel. Self-esteem, in Becker’s account, is the felt sense of heroism. A child who loses his footing in one such system, torn from the warm and familiar and dropped among strangers, loses the ground of his own worth. That is Luke on the bus.

Lane hands some of it back.

The Van Howd home runs on a different code than the one Luke carries north from the Adventist church. On Super Bowl Sunday, January 25, 1981, the boys watch the Oakland Raiders take apart the Philadelphia Eagles. Nancy Van Howd sets the terms of the house out loud. “God comes first in this home,” she says. “And sports comes second.” In Luke’s home sport sits nowhere near second. Sport is idolatry, and he has learned to hide how much he loves it. In the Van Howd home a boy talks about the girls he likes. In Luke’s home there is no dating, no banter about crushes, no salvation offered by the opposite sex until the wedding. The Van Howds are Pentecostal, perhaps Assembly of God. Luke’s people are hyper-intellectual Adventists who hold God at the distance of doctrine.

Two hero systems share a Bible and almost nothing else.

Set the values of Lane’s world beside the values of Luke’s and watch them refuse to translate. Vitality stands at the center of the Van Howd code. A boy should be in motion, loud, athletic, sure of himself, spending his life rather than guarding it. The same vigor reads in the Adventist home as appetite unmastered. There the body is a temple under discipline, the diet policed, the energy banked against the Second Coming. What Lane’s mother files just under God, Luke’s family files near sin. Confidence in Auburn is leadership and manhood, the Reagan-era American certainty that the man who knows his own mind should act on it. Confidence in the Adventist home shades toward pride, the first sin, the one that cost Lucifer heaven. Warmth in the Van Howd home is a currency. The boy who lifts the mood of a room performs something close to a sacred act. Warmth in Luke’s home ranks below seriousness, and a boy earns his standing by the rigor of his mind, not the heat of his company.

Hospitality runs through the Van Howd code as well. The family takes in the strange Adventist boy with no fuss, gives him rides and cold drinks and a seat at the Super Bowl, and asks nothing back. To shelter the stranger is to do a thing the system counts as honor.

The deepest article of the Van Howd faith is a God who acts now. Luke is raised on an academic approach to Him, a God who reasons through Scripture and intervenes at the end of history, on schedule, at the resurrection promised for the last day. The Van Howds expect Him in the room. They ask Him to heal, to move, to break into the afternoon. This is the article that will be tested in July.

The word at the center of Lane’s world is life, and the word will not hold still when you carry it across a property line. For the hospice nurse who sits through the long afternoons with the dying, life is a finite thing to ease toward a good close, and the gentle death is the achievement. For the Theravada monk, life is the wheel, the round of birth and suffering and birth again, and the prize is release from it, so another turn counts as the failure. For the cattle rancher above Auburn, life is stock and season, born and fattened and shipped on the calendar, and tenderness toward it is a cost the ledger will not carry. For the combat medic, life is the thing he buys back by the minute under fire, some men worked and some men set aside, the triage tag standing in for the judgment of God. For the Calvinist a few miles down the road from the Van Howds, life is a script written before the foundation of the world, and a boy’s death belongs to that script, no emergency in it, no scandal, the settled decree of Him who does all things well. Each man says the word and points at a different universe.

Lane’s universe holds that life is vital force, charged, given to be spent, and that the God who gives it can give it back across the line of death if His people ask with enough belief. In July that belief meets its hardest hour.

Ninth grade ends in June 1981. The Ford family moves a few miles off. Luke stops seeing Lane. In mid-July the word reaches him that Lane has died, a passenger in a car wreck, no one else hurt.

The same news reaches Auburn by a stranger road. Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) has made Douglas Van Howd, Lane’s father, the White House artist, and the sculptor is at work on a gift for the Netherlands, an American Indian and an eagle set on a piece of petrified Arizona wood. Reagan’s counsel, Herbert Ellingwood, carries the news to him in Washington. The father’s mind will not take it. Why does the top man in the White House tell me this, he thinks. No, no, no, that is not my kid. But it is. He cannot finish the sculpture until 1984. The gift never reaches the Dutch. It stands instead in the Roosevelt Room, a monument to a week the maker could not work.

The service runs in a church Luke has never sat in, an open casket at the front, Lane in his Sunday best, looking well. Luke has buried people before, but no one his own age, and never under a roof that expects God to act in the hour. The pastor preaches a nearer God than Luke knows. At the peak of the message he puts the question to the room. If you believe God can raise Lane from the dead right now, he says, raise your hand.

Almost every hand goes up. Luke’s goes up with them. For that moment the Adventist boy, raised to keep God at the length of an argument, believes that God can return his friend to the room. He shuts his eyes and prays for the miracle. He opens them and holds his breath and stares at the coffin and waits for a rising that never comes.

Becker writes that every hero system, under all its forms, works to deny that death is final. Here the denial drops its disguise and stands in the open. A room full of believers refuses the casket and asks God to reverse it on the spot. The hand goes up because the alternative, the box as the last word and the universe as indifferent to a sixteen-year-old boy, cannot be borne. When the miracle holds off, the system does not break. It folds the loss into a longer promise. He is with the Lord. We will see him again. Becker might note the resourcefulness of a hero system that can take its own apparent refutation and feed it back into the faith. The Van Howd code stakes everything on the present-tense God, and when the present tense fails it borrows the future tense the Adventists keep, the resurrection deferred to the last day. The two systems, so far apart at the Super Bowl, reach for the same consolation at the grave.

Lane never built a hero system. He inherited one and wore it with ease, a borrowed code that happened to fit him. Most accounts of a man’s hero system trace the project he spent decades constructing. Lane had no project yet. He had charm and a body and sixteen years and a family that loved God and football in that order. Death came before he could complicate any of it, which leaves him a clean specimen of the thing the rest of us muddy by living long enough to revise. What he gave Luke was not doctrine. It was the door out of the cocoon, the first friend outside the Adventist fold, the sign that another code existed and that a boy could be happy inside it. From tenth grade on Luke went to public school, where no one spoke of resurrection at all, a third system, with its own gods and its own silence.

Luke was not much comfort to the family that morning. His words were few and his face gave little. Nancy Van Howd called his mother once, a few years on, to touch base. He could not face the pain in that home, so he let the line go quiet. The good family that sheltered the stray passed out of his life.

Becker holds that a man needs to feel he counts, and that he will build, borrow, or stumble into a scheme that lets him feel it against the fact of death. For one winter and spring a boy in motion lent that feeling to a miserable stranger on a long bus route, and asked nothing back, and then went into the ground at sixteen while a church held up its hands and a father in Washington set down his tools. The word for what Lane had is life. He spent it the way his people taught him to, all at once, and early.

Posted in Auburn | Comments Off on God Comes First, and Sports Comes Second

The Sportswriter

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

Scott Hamelin and I go to Placer High School together 1982-1984. We are friendly. The friend I make is his father.
Joe Hamelin is the Sports Editor of the Sacramento Bee (he used to be a beat writer assigned to the San Diego Clippers). He’s remarried and he has six sons. He covers the pros. He writes about the best players alive, and his peers honor him for it. None of that is why I call him. I call him because he picks up, and once he picks up he stays on the line.
The calls run long. A weekday afternoon, the receiver warm against my ear, Joe on the other end with the patience of a man who has nowhere he wants to be more. We talk about journalism. We talk about the career I want before I have done a thing to deserve wanting it. He gives me his afternoons. Over the months the hours pass a hundred. He tells me that Coach Hubie Brown called his players cocksuckers. He tells me that there is no white basketball and black basketball, that no race is faster than any other, that the Sacramento Union won’t be a real competitor until they put in more resources.
Then he gives me more than talk. For two years (1983-1984) we sit together in a community access cable booth and call Placer High men’s basketball. Wood benches. A gym that smells of floor wax and sweat. A camera my classmate Eric aims at the court. Joe has sat courtside for the finest players in the game, and now he calls a high school contest beside a teenager as if more than 10 people watched it (“Nobody ever comments to me about these broadcasts,” he tells me).
Then he gives me the thing that turns a boy into a professional. He hands me an assignment. Cover a high school basketball tournament (Kendall Arnett) for the Bee. They pay me. My reports run in the paper that lands on driveways across the valley. A man who could have spent that assignment on anyone spends it on me.
A classmate mocks me for my hero worship of Joe Hamelin. I don’t mind too much. I have this thing inside of me that needs to worship some people, and it is embarrassing, but Joe is kind to me and he doesn’t make any demands. I’m not fodder for a cause. I’m a smart kid who knows more about sports than any kid he’s known because I learned it from reading books and all the back issues of Time, Newsweek, Life and Sports Illustrated magazines (read the summer of 1977 at Pacific Union College). My home didn’t get a TV until 1980.
I intern at the Auburn Journal Sports Department for six months (late 1983 and early 1984) but my editor Rob Knies doesn’t want a Joe Hamelin profile. “We compete with the Bee. We’re not going to help the Bee.”
Ernest Becker (1924-1974) wrote The Denial of Death in 1973. He says a man cannot live with the knowledge that he will die and rot and be forgotten, so every culture hands him a hero system, a set of roles and rules that let him feel he counts, that some part of him outlasts the body. The hero system tells a man what a good life looks like, what earns honor, what a worthy man does with his days. Inside it he can be a hero on a small scale. Outside it the same acts read as nothing.
Joe lived inside the hero system of the American daily newspaper. Its temple is the sports desk. Its scripture is the box score. Its sacrament is the deadline, the nightly small death after which the day’s work sets and cannot be revised. Its sacred value, the one that orders the rest, is credit.
Joe wrote a column three days a week. It was good.
Credit, in the newsroom, means honor assigned by the record. The score does not lie. You name the man who scored and you name the man who missed, and you do not root in the press box. The byline is the reward and the receipt at once, a man’s name fixed in type, a small immortality on cheap paper that yellows but sits in a library for good. To give a man a byline enters him in the book of those who were here and did the work.
The word changes at the border. Carry credit into other hero systems and it grows a new meaning.
A Benedictine copyist in a cold scriptorium spends his life on a single manuscript and signs none of it. Credit, for him, is sin. The work rises to God, and a name in the margin steals from Him what is His. The monk earns his place by erasing himself from the page.
A Plains warrior counting coup cannot be given credit and spits on the offer. Credit is the blow struck on a living enemy before witnesses, seized on a horse, never assigned by an editor at a desk. What Joe hands across a table the warrior takes in the open or never holds at all.
A loan shark keeps a different book. Credit is what he extends so a man will owe him, leverage dressed as kindness, a line in a ledger that ends in a broken hand. He gives credit to own you. Joe gives credit to free you.
A cadre at a struggle session learns that claiming credit is the deviation that gets a man denounced. The achievement belongs to the collective, the Party, the Chairman, and the man who signs his own name has confessed a crime. The byline Joe prizes serves, in that room, as evidence against you.
A Reformed preacher tells his flock that credit is grace, unearned and unearnable, imputed by God to men who merit nothing. Salvation comes as a gift because no work can buy it. Joe’s faith runs the other way. In his church you earn the line of type. The kid covers the tournament, files clean copy, and the name is his because he did the thing.
Joe’s hero system holds that credit is earned. The score adjudicates. The byline belongs to the man who reported the game. Yet what Joe does for me is advance credit to a boy who has earned nothing, the way a banker advances a loan to a borrower with no history, on faith, against future work. The honor economy of the newsroom and the gift economy of the mentor live inside the same man and the same word. He believes credit must be earned, and he lends it to me before I can earn it, because that loan is how the hero system reproduces. An old man recruits a young one by advancing him significance he has not yet paid for. The hundred hours, the cable booth, the tournament byline: an initiation. Joe does what his religion asks of its elders, which is to make more of themselves before they die.
The hard part comes after. The hero system Joe served thins out. Sports desks empty. Papers fold or shrink to a website and a skeleton staff. The permanent printed record, the byline that was to outlast the man, proves as mortal as the man. Joe advanced me credit in a currency that lost most of its value. The driveways stopped getting the paper. The libraries cleared the bound volumes. A young man who built his life on the byline found that byline worth less each year.
The gift held anyway. The thing that transferred in that booth was never the byline. It was the standard. You name who scored. You do not root in the press box. You file clean and on time and you let the reader have his own reaction. A man carries that into work the newspaper never imagined, onto platforms Joe never saw, long after the desk he loved goes dark. The currency failed. The faith it taught did not.
In 1990, Joe wrote To Fly and Fight: Memoirs of a Triple Ace about Clarence E. Anderson, an Auburn resident who was buried with honors at Arlington National Cemetery on March 30, 2026.
Around 1990, Joe quit his job to write books full-time. I don’t think he published another book, and eventually he went back to writing for newspapers, retiring around 2005.
In 1988, I came down with what some doctors called chronic fatigue syndrome. Tossing and turning on my bed circa 1991, I get up and call Joe and he visits me. All of my friends my own age keep their distance, but everyone over 40 treats me with compassion.
In 1994, I return to two-thirds of a normal life, and once I get regular internet connection starting in 1997, I hunt Joe down to exchange emails.
There lies the strange grace of a hero system. It hands a man a project that death defeats, and in the handing it makes him more than he becomes alone. Joe knew, on some floor of himself, that the paper would not save him. He sat in the gym anyway and called the game as if the wire were waiting, and he gave a job that paid, and he made a writer. Forty years on I am still spending the credit he advanced. He never asked for it back.

Posted in Auburn, Journalism | Comments Off on The Sportswriter

Live

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

The teletype runs all night. It is July 6, 1985, and I am nineteen, an intern at KAHI in Auburn, and I sit in the booth from eight to five on the weekends and read the news two and a half minutes past the hour, after the AP feed clears. Tonight I go to the track of my almer mater, Placer High School. The Western States Endurance Run starts at dawn up at Squaw Valley and the runners come a hundred miles through the canyons in the heat and finish on the track starting just before dawn and I am thrilled to deliver updates through the night, running back and forth every hour from the track to the station and back.

I stand in the announcer’s booth and the announcer says he’s relying on what he’s hearing on the radio, and I say, that’s me.

While we wait for the first runners, I see a network man standing at the edge of it in a good blazer. Jim Lampley (b. April 8, 1949). He is with ABC, and he has covered the Super Bowl that year and he will cover the New York Marathon that fall, and he is here for the run. I know his face from the television. I ask him for a few minutes for an interview. He gives them. He talks to me as though I work somewhere that counts, and I do not.

After my all-nighter, news director Pete DuFour begins paying me for sixteen hours a week at $3.50 an hour, and the money thrills me. I have an open mike to the world and I am only 19. I keep the job until I leave for UCLA in August of 1988.

Jim King wins in sixteen hours, two minutes, forty-four seconds. The runners come off the trail with their faces gone slack and their crews holding them by the elbows, and the men who started at dawn finish in the dark, and some of them weep, and a doctor checks their feet.

There’s a scrum of reporters around King, and Sacramento Bee sports editor Joe Hamelin, my friend, tells me to use my elbows to fight my way to the story. “Journalism is a young man’s game,” he says.

At five am, I try to get some sleep on the floor of the news room. I get up about 7 am, and check the Auburn Journal. A missing woman has been found dead. I give the news live. I record bulletins for the rest of the day. I go home and watch Boris Becker win Wimbledon and fall asleep.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) wrote The Denial of Death about men like the ones I watched finish, and about the man in the blazer, and about the boy at the AP teletype. Becker says a culture is a hero system. It hands its members a set of routes by which a man may feel he counts in the order of things, may feel he is more than meat that rots, may earn a place that outlasts the body. The runner takes one route. He buys his significance with his legs. A hundred miles of granite and heat is a bid, scored in hours and minutes, visible to all, and at the finish the bid is paid or it is not. Jim King pays his in sixteen hours. The man who quits at mile eighty pays nothing and goes home with his feet wrapped and his bid refused. The arena is honest that way. The body either does the thing or it does not.

The announcer takes a different route, and his is the route I have spent my life near, so I should say what it costs and what it buys.

Lampley does not run. He stands at the finish in the blazer and he names what the runners did. The feat is fast and it is gone. King crosses the line and the moment dies the instant it happens, the way all moments die, and the announcer’s work is to catch it in the half second of its dying and fix it in words so that it survives. He is the witness. He confers permanence. The runner makes the moment with his body and the announcer makes it last with his voice, and of the two, the voice travels farther and lives longer. King’s run lives in his own legs for a season. It lives in the broadcast for as long as men keep the tape. This is the announcer’s immortality project, in Becker’s phrase. He earns his place in the order of things by standing at the edge of other men’s feats and giving them a voice. Years later Lampley will stand over a knocked-out fighter and shout that it happened, and the shout will outlive the punch, and men who never saw the fight will know the call.

The word at the center of his hero system is live. He works live. The whole worth of the man lies in being present at the moment of consequence and speaking into it while it is still warm, before it cools into history. A recording is not the thing. The thing is the live moment, witnessed and named, unrepeatable, gone if you miss it. So I want to hold that word up, because a sacred word means one thing inside one hero system and another thing inside the next, and the men who use it think they are speaking the same language.

To Lampley, live is the unrepeatable instant he is paid to catch. To the smokejumper stepping out the door of the plane over a ridge in flame, live is the fire that breathes and runs and will kill him if he reads the wind wrong. To the labor and delivery nurse at three in the morning, live is the thing that comes out blue and silent and then, if God is good and her hands are quick, cries. To the bomb technician kneeling over the device, live means the charge is hot and one wrong move ends the conversation. To the Carmelite behind the grille who has not left the enclosure in thirty years, live names the only thing she trusts, the presence she gives her hours to, the One she calls the Living God, and the runners and the fire and the wire are to her a noise outside the wall. To the session bassist laying down a take with the tape rolling and no fixing it after, live is the one pass that has the feel, the pass you cannot get back. Each man kneels to the word. Each man means a different god by it. Lampley’s god is the moment that will not wait, and he has built a whole life on being there for it, microphone in hand, while the rest of us hear about it later.

Now the scene at the finish, told again, because Becker explains the thing I felt and could not name at nineteen. A boy at the bottom of a hero system meets a man near the top of it, and the man blesses him. Becker calls this transference. We take our sense of worth from the figures who seem to hold the power to grant it. The father holds it first. After the father, the culture hands the power to its heroes, and the young man scans the room for whoever carries it now. I scanned the finish at Placer High and there he was in the blazer, the man from the television, the man who got to be live for a living, and he turned and spoke to me as though I belonged in the work. He did not have to. The secure man can afford the gift. He had his place in the order of things and could spare a piece of it for a stranger, and the piece he spared is the reason I remember the night forty years on and have told it more than once. The three fifty an hour bought groceries. The blessing bought something a teenager wants more than groceries, which is the sense that the thing he loves will have him.

Here is the part the other ten essays leave out, and I want it in because truth comes before comfort. The announcer’s route has a hole at the center of it. He is never the man who does the deed. He stands at the finish and never runs the canyons. His immortality is borrowed, every grain of it, from the bodies of other men. King’s legs earn the run and Lampley earns the words about the run, and the words last longer, and still the words are about a thing the speaker did not do. The witness lives inside other men’s moments and owns none of them. Lampley spent thirty years at ringside calling the courage of men who got hit in the face for money, and his voice is famous and their faces are wrecked, and that is the trade the witness makes. He keeps his teeth. He keeps the call. He does not keep a single punch as his own.

I do not think this makes the route a low one. The priest never dies for the sins of the world and still he stands at the altar and says the words that make the bread holy, and the words are not a fraud because his own body stayed whole. The announcer is the priest of the secular arena. He consecrates. He stands where the deed happens and he says what it was, and by saying it he lets the men who were not there share in it, which is most of us, which is the whole point of a hero system, that it gives the ordinary man a way to touch significance he could not reach alone. Becker would say the runner and the announcer and the boy at the teletype are all running the same race by different roads, all of them trying to count, all of them refusing to be only meat.

The winner came in at two minutes past four in the morning by the official clock, sixteen hours and change after the gun. I read it on the air at two and a half minutes past the hour, after the AP cleared, the way I read everything for the next two years. A man I had watched on television stood at the line and gave a nineteen-year-old his time. I have been trying to be live ever since, present at the moment and able to say what it was, and I have never once been sorry, and the pay has rarely been better.

Posted in Auburn, Journalism | Comments Off on Live

The Whole Cup

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

A man sits at my father’s table with something he cannot carry alone. My father gives him the Sabbath afternoon and takes him for a five-mile walk. He does this for years. People come with marriages breaking, with sons in jail, with the cold certainty that God has turned away. My father never meets a woman alone, and across a lifetime no one accuses him of anything. He guards that room the way a man guards what he values most.

In 1983 I ask him why he spends the hours this way. He is busy. Desmond Ford (1929-2019) carries his name on the radio across Australia and America, holds two doctorates, writes book after book. An afternoon with one man is an afternoon stolen from a sermon that reaches thousands. I tell him so.

He answers with water. When you speak over the air, he says, you take your cup and pour it ten thousand ways. When you sit with one man who needs you, you give him the whole cup.

I keep the line for forty years because it explains more than counsel. It explains the shape of his life and the reason a church that loved him could not keep him.

Ernest Becker (1924-1973) gives me the tool to read that cup. In The Denial of Death he argues that a man cannot live with the knowledge of his own death, so he builds a system of meaning that lets him feel he counts in a scheme larger and longer than his body. Becker calls these hero systems. A culture hands each man a way to earn significance and to outlast the grave by serving something that does not die. The soldier earns it through the flag. The scholar earns it through the book that survives him. The father earns it through the child. Take a man’s hero system away and you tell him his life adds to nothing, that he dies for nothing. No man hears that in peace.

My father lives inside a hero system with a name and an address. Seventh-day Adventism hands its people a part in the last act of history. The believer keeps the seventh-day Sabbath while the world keeps Sunday, eats clean, stands apart from the age, and waits as one of a final generation whose faithfulness figures in the close of cosmic time. The doctrine that holds this together is the investigative judgment. Adventists teach that in 1844 Christ entered the inner room of a sanctuary in heaven and began to examine the records of the professed people of God, name by name, settling each case before He returns. A man who believes this holds a seat at the center of the universe’s last reckoning. His Sabbath counts. His diet counts. His name waits in a book in heaven for the day it comes up.

Becker might recognize the arrangement at once. An immortality project written across the heavens, and the believer cast as a witness in the closing scene.

My father reads the doctrine and finds no floor under it. He argues that the investigative judgment, as the church teaches it, has thin biblical ground and a heavy price. The price is assurance. If a man’s case waits in an open ledger, examined and not yet closed, then he cannot rest. He works and watches and fears the audit. My father preaches the reverse. The verdict comes at the cross, he says, finished, in the past tense, available to a man tonight. He calls people to rest in a salvation already secured.

On October 27, 1979 he gives a talk at a forum at Pacific Union College and lays the case in the open. The church summons him to Washington and gives him six months. He writes 991 pages, the manuscript known as Daniel 8:14, the Day of Atonement, and the Investigative Judgment, and opens it with the claim that he means to defend the church.

In August 1980, at a ranch called Glacier View in Colorado, a committee of more than a hundred theologians and administrators sits to weigh what he has written. Men who studied beside him at Avondale sit across the room. His old mentor, Edward Heppenstall (1901-1994), cannot move him and later writes that he stands shocked at how far my father has swung. The committee finishes its work in five days. My father loses his ministerial credentials. He keeps his membership in the church. He drives home a layman.

Read the expulsion through Becker and it stops looking like a quarrel over a date in the book of Daniel. My father does not tug a loose thread. The investigative judgment is the doctrine that makes Adventists the remnant and not one more Protestant body with an odd day of worship. Remove it and the special part in the last act goes with it. The committee cannot grant the point and stay who they are. To accept my father is to hear that the thing setting them at the center of cosmic history rests on sand. Becker tells us how a man answers that news. He does not thank the messenger.

Here sits the part most accounts miss. My father does not take a hero system away and leave rubble. He offers another one. He hands his people the Reformation gospel, the old Protestant settlement where the heroism belongs to Christ and the man rests in it. He trades an immortality project of vigilance for an immortality project of rest. The church cannot read the trade as a gift, because the gift costs them their own place in heaven’s drama.

The whole quarrel turns on a single word, and the word will not sit still. Assurance.

For my father, assurance is the verdict already entered, the cross in the past tense, a salvation a man may lean his whole weight on before he sleeps.

Carry the word into other rooms and watch it change.

To an actuary, assurance is a price set on a death. He builds his life assurance from a table of ages and odds, a hedge against the certain day. The word holds no comfort in his hands. It holds arithmetic.

To an auditor who signs the opinion, assurance comes reasonable and never absolute. His firm stakes its name on books it has tested by sample, and he writes the word knowing it falls short of a guarantee. He offers assurance and swears in the same breath that it is not one.

To a medic working on a man under fire, assurance is the voice that says stay with me, the hand pressing the wound, a promise made while the outcome stays unknown.

To a pianist in the third movement, assurance lives in the hands. The body does not doubt through the hard passage. This self-assurance owes nothing to God and everything to years at the keys.

To a man nursing the dying in a hospice, assurance is the held hand and the managed pain and the refusal to promise a cure that will not come. He assures the dying of company, not of recovery.

To a debtor standing before a judge, assurance is the discharge that cancels the debt, the slate cleared by the law, a grace with a courthouse stamp on it.

Each man speaks the same word. Each holds it as something near to sacred inside his own system. Each means a thing the others do not recognize. Becker’s point sits right here. A word does not carry meaning the way a coin carries value, fixed and portable across every counter. A word draws its meaning from the hero system that gives a man his stakes. My father and the auditor and the medic can sit at one table and use one word and talk past each other, because each protects a different immortality with it.

This returns me to the cup. The broadcast is significance by scale. The cup poured ten thousand ways, the name carried far, the voice in cars on the highway and kitchens at breakfast. A hero system of its own, the system of the public man, and my father lives in it and feels its pull. He knows what the platform offers. The afternoon with one man is the other thing. The whole cup to a single soul.

The theology and the counsel turn out to be the same act. The investigative judgment keeps significance in a ledger across the whole mass of the saved, each name a line, the cup poured a million ways. Assurance hands the whole cup to one man at a table, undivided, his to drink tonight. When my father chooses the single soul over the audience of thousands, he makes in a kitchen the choice he made in his theology and the choice that cost him his collar. The one over the ten thousand. The whole cup over the shared sip. He spends his life persuaded that God works this way. Not by quota across a remnant. By the whole cup to the one who sits down across from him.

I disagreed with my father about a great deal. I overheard parts of the counsel he gave for years, and the wisdom of it held even where the doctrine did not. A man came to the table carrying what he could not carry. He left lighter. My father poured out the cup and did not measure it. He died on March 11, 2019, on the Queensland coast, ninety years old, still sure the cross had settled the verdict, still giving the whole cup to whoever sat down across from him.

Posted in Desmond Ford | Comments Off on The Whole Cup

Mulholland Drive

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

David Lynch (1946–2025) turned sixty on January 20, 2006. The party sat in a restaurant near La Cienega and Melrose, the kind of room where the lighting flatters everyone and the valet knows which cars to bring around first. A producer who worked with Lynch had brought me. He had a plan for me that night, and the plan was Laura Harring (b. 1964).
He walked me over. He said something about how we should meet, the way a man speaks when he has already decided two people belong together. Then he left us standing at the bar. She turned to me. She gave me her attention, which felt like standing too close to a window in winter, all that light and I got scared. We talked for five minutes. I have no memory of a single thing said. I remember leaving her. I remember the relief of the back of the party, the ordinary world where a man like me knew the rules and where Gary Oldman’s manager Douglas Urbanski takes mercy on me and talks to me for the rest of the night while Lynch, Sting, Nicole Kidman and the beautiful people party.
I fled a beautiful woman at a film director’s birthday. That is the whole anecdote, and it is enough, because the question worth asking is not why I ran. The question is what she carried into that room that made running feel like the only safe move. She carried a hero system. So did I. They did not match, and the mismatch threw me.
Ernest Becker (1924–1974) argued in The Denial of Death that every man builds his life inside a scheme that tells him he counts, that his small span on earth touches something that does not die. A cop earns it through the badge. A scholar earns it through the footnote. A mother earns it through the child. The scheme hands out significance, and it hands out terror to those who fail its terms, and it lets a man look at his own death and say, not me, not really, because I belong to something larger. Becker called these schemes the routes to heroism. A culture is a pooled effort to feel immortal. Laura Harring built hers out of the one material she was handed early and could not refuse. She built it out of her face.
Start with the bullet. She grew up the first ten years of her life in Sinaloa, in Guasave, daughter of a Mexican spiritual teacher and a developer of Austrian-German blood. The family moved to San Antonio. At twelve a stray round from a drive-by shooting caught her in the head, a .45, and she lived. Sit with that. A girl takes a bullet meant for the air and survives, and the survival is not a thing she earned through merit or prayer. It simply happened to her body. A child who absorbs that learns early that the body holds death inside it at all times, and that life past the wound is a kind of borrowed thing she now has to justify. Becker would say the wound makes the hero system urgent. Most men keep death abstract. She could not. She had felt it enter her skull.
What she did next reads like a sprint away from the grave by way of transformation. Switzerland at sixteen, Aiglon College. The London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art, commedia dell’arte, the Argentine tango. El Paso, then the pageant ladder, Miss El Paso, Miss Texas, and in 1985 Miss USA, the first Hispanic woman to take the crown. A year wandering Asia and Europe and a stretch as a social worker in India. A marriage in 1987 to Count Carl-Eduard von Bismarck-Schönhausen, great-great-grandson of Otto von Bismarck (1815–1898), and a divorce two years later. She dropped the e from Herring and became Harring. Then Hollywood, and then the role that fixed her, Rita in Lynch’s Mulholland Drive (2001), an amnesiac with no past who picks her name off a poster for Gilda because she sees Rita Hayworth (1918–1987) and decides to be her. Roger Ebert (1942–2013) wrote that Harring could stand still and make the case for remaking Gilda. The International Herald Tribune reached for Ava Gardner (1922–1990).
Here sits her sacred value, and here sits the trick Becker hands us. The value is to be looked at. To be a beautiful woman who walks into a room and gathers every eye, and to hold the gaze, and to make of that gaze a vocation rather than an accident. For Laura the gaze is how the girl who took the bullet becomes the image that outlives the body. Film fixes the face forever. She told an interviewer that film means something, that a man can make a difference with a film. She means that the screen catches a woman and keeps her past her own death. That is the immortality her hero system promises. The gaze is salvation.
Now watch the same value move through other rooms, and watch it mean something different in each, because the word holds still while the worlds around it change.
To the pageant judge in 1985, to be looked at is to be measured. The gaze ranks. It assigns a number, crowns a winner, and the woman who masters it has achieved something the judge can score and defend. She wore a cowgirl costume to Miss Universe, all-American, the body as a flag. In that room the gaze is merit. You win it.
To Lynch the gaze is dread. His whole life’s work pries up the beautiful surface to show the thing squirming under it, the severed ear in the clean grass, the homecoming queen face-down. Critics noted that death by head wound runs through his films like a watermark. He cast a woman who carried a real head wound to play a woman with no memory, pure surface, a face without a past. In Lynch’s room the gaze does not save the beautiful woman. It hollows her. The camera looks and looks until the face stops meaning safety and starts meaning the abyss. Mulholland Drive ends in Hollywood’s promise curdling into a corpse. The dream of being looked at kills the woman who chases it.
(I asked somebody on the film what it meant and he said it didn’t mean anything.)
To the Bismarck world the gaze means lineage. An aristocratic name turns a wife into an ornament that reflects the house. Beauty there carries a duty to the bloodline and the title, Gräfin von Bismarck, and the gaze rests on her the way it rests on a family portrait. She married into it and left inside two years, which tells you the fit was wrong, that her hero system ran on becoming and theirs ran on having always been.
To her grandmother’s Sinaloa, the Catholic world she came from, a beautiful girl looked at by men means danger. The gaze there is the evil eye and the appetite of strangers and the thing a mother warns her daughter against. Beauty is a gift from God and a trap men set, and the modest answer is to lower your eyes and cover up and not give the village a reason to talk. To be looked at is to be at risk.
To the spiritual current her mother taught, and to the India where she did her social work, the gaze runs the other way. The body is a veil. The face is the least true thing about a person. To see and be seen by the holy, darshan, is the only looking that counts, and the beautiful surface is the very illusion a soul must see through to reach what does not pass. In that room her sacred value is the snare, and freedom means caring nothing for the mirror.
To the Hollywood agent the gaze is a market. A face is an asset with a depreciation schedule, and the studio looks at a woman the way a buyer looks at a property, pricing the years she has left. The casting list, the close-up, the call that comes or does not. In that room to be looked at is to be appraised and, in time, marked down.
To the feminist critic the gaze erases. To be looked at is to be turned into an object, the woman emptied of self and filled with the wanting of the man who watches. Salvation for Laura reads as capture to the critic. The thing Laura built her life around is the thing the critic wants dismantled.
Seven rooms. One woman walks into each, the same woman with the same face, and the same act of being looked at means triumph, dread, inheritance, sin, illusion, price, and erasure. The word sits still. The hero systems move. Becker’s point lands here. There is no neutral place from which to say what her beauty means, because meaning lives inside a scheme, and the schemes do not agree, and each one feels to its members like plain reality rather than one bet among many.
Which returns me to the David Lynch party. I ran because her hero system and mine had no common term. She lived by the face and the gaze and the screen that keeps the body past its death. I live by the word on the page, the footnote, the small contribution to knowledge that might sit in a library after I am gone. Two routes to the same destination, two ways of refusing the grave, and at that bar they could not trade. She offered the immortality of the beautiful image. I had no idea how to receive it, and I told myself I had nothing she could use, so I gave her five minutes and ran.
The bullet sits under all of it. A girl survives a shot to the head and spends a life turning her face into something that cannot be killed twice. Then a director who films death by head wound puts her on the screen as a woman with no past, and the world calls it her finest work. Becker would not be surprised. The hero system is the thing we build to keep the wound from being the whole story. Hers worked. The face survives. The bullet did not get the last look.

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on Mulholland Drive

Good Evening, Folks

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

The Capitol dome stands lit. It is July 1980. It is evening on the East Front, the marble still giving back the day’s heat. A black limousine waits at the curb with the engine running. A Capitol policeman holds a loose perimeter made mostly of his own boredom. An aide carries a leather case and a folded coat over one arm.

A family stands on the sidewalk. A father, a mother, a boy of fourteen whose feet hurt from a day of walking. A big man comes down toward the car, white hair, heavy in the shoulders, a rumpled suit, the wide face of a man who has eaten a thousand dinners he never paid for. He stands second in the line of succession to the President of the United States. He could pass the family without seeing them. Men at that height stop seeing the people on the curb. He stops. He looks at them. He says, “Good evening, folks.” Then the door, the car, the red lights going down the avenue.

The boy holds those three words for the rest of his life.

This is the thing a hero system does, and it does it so fast you miss the size of it. Ernest Becker (1924-1974) gives us the term. In The Denial of Death he argues that man builds his whole culture to outrun one piece of knowledge, that he dies, and that he carries under everything the suspicion that he is nobody, an animal who rots in the ground like the rest. A hero system answers the suspicion. It tells a man how to count. It hands him a way to feel he is an object of first value in a world that means something. Take the scheme away and the terror comes back. Give a man his place in it and he can stand at the edge of his own death without shaking.

Tip O’Neill (1912-1994) ran a hero system whose first article holds that no man is nobody.

He came up in North Cambridge, Massachusetts, the son of a bricklayer who rose to run the city sewers and sit on the council. The parish set the boundaries of the world. The priest, the precinct, the wake, the union card, the family that had been on the block for fifty years. O’Neill went to Boston College and lost his first race, for the Cambridge City Council, in 1935. A neighbor he had known all his life, an older woman whose walk he had shoveled, told him afterward that she had voted for him though he never once asked her to. He had taken her for granted. The lesson stayed with him. People want to be asked. People want to be seen. A man who assumes them loses them, and he deserves to.

He won the next time and kept winning. He took the seat John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) left when Kennedy went to the Senate. He became Speaker of the House in 1977 and held it ten years. He fought Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) across the whole of the 1980s, called the budget cuts a war on the working man, and meant it, and then drank with Reagan after six o’clock and traded Irish stories, because the fight ran on the personal and so did the friendship and both men came out of a system old enough to hold the two at once.

Now name the value at the center of it. The word is respect. In O’Neill’s world respect lives in small acts performed in person. The handshake. The name remembered across thirty years. The wake attended for a man whose vote you lost. The favor done and the favor returned. Asking for the vote instead of assuming it. “All politics is local,” he said, and gave the line to his father, and what he meant runs deeper than electoral math. He meant that a man becomes real to you when you stand in front of him and grant him your attention. The greeting on the curb is the whole religion of the ward, pressed into three words and spent on a stranger who can do nothing for him. The boy casts no vote in his district. The boy cannot return the favor. O’Neill greets him anyway. In his scheme the strong hand recognition to the weak and ask nothing back.

But carry the word respect out of O’Neill’s world and watch it change shape in every other one.

A Marine gunnery sergeant hears it and thinks of something earned in mud and never handed over on a sidewalk. Respect runs up the chain by rank and down it by what a man does when the rounds come in. You salute the commission first and the man only after he has paid for the rest. A stranger’s good evening buys nothing on that ground.

On a trading floor respect is the number. It is the position that pays when the whole desk leans the other way, the call no one else had the stomach to make. Warmth is overhead. A man who stops on a curb to greet strangers has time he should put to better use, and the floor will price his softness within the hour.

Behind a monastery wall a monk hears the word and flinches at it. To want respect is the oldest vanity, the self stepping forward when the self should vanish. His order runs on the reverse move. He hollows out the place where the hunger to count would sit and gives the empty room to God. The small thing O’Neill spends on the boy, the thing of being seen, is the very thing this man has taken a vow to stop wanting.

On a hard corner a young man hears respect and reaches for it with his body. Respect is not being disrespected. It runs zero-sum and gets defended in real time and a slight cannot pass. The Speaker’s free greeting reads as weakness here, a thing thrown away by a man rich enough not to feel the loss.

In a quiet room a hospice nurse hears the word and thinks of a body she washes and a name she keeps using after the mind behind it has gone dark. Respect is the worth she guards in people the world has finished counting. She and O’Neill might know each other on sight. Both hand significance to the ones the powerful have stopped seeing. The same word that splits the monk from the trader closes the distance between the nurse and the Speaker.

So the word holds steady on the page and shifts underfoot. Each man speaks it with full conviction and means a different thing, because each stands inside a different scheme for how a life counts, and the scheme decides the meaning. There is no neutral respect floating above the systems. There is the gunnery sergeant’s and the trader’s and the monk’s and the nurse’s, and there is O’Neill’s, and a man raised in one of them can spend a whole evening with a man raised in another and never learn that the two of them were not discussing the same thing.

O’Neill died on January 5, 1994. The system he served has thinned since. The parish loosened its hold, the wake gave way to the cable hit, the favor lost its standing, and the personal touch he spent his life perfecting now reads to many as an old corruption dressed up as warmth. But the three words he gave the boy still do their work. The boy is a man now, and he writes, and he sets the evening down on the page. In setting it down he pays O’Neill back in O’Neill’s own currency. He remembers the name. He says it again where others can hear it.

That is the trade running both ways. The hero system grants the small man a moment of counting on a public sidewalk. The small man, holding the moment across the decades and writing it out, hands the great man a thin slice of the one thing every hero system is built to chase and none can keep. Three words on a curb at evening. A man dead thirty years. The whole religion of the ward, working at distance, working past death, doing the only thing it ever promised to do.

Good evening, folks.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Good Evening, Folks

The Joe Starkey Hero System

Posted on June 23, 2026 by Luke Ford

In 1980 I am thirteen and I want to be a voice. Not a player. A voice. I write a letter to Joe Starkey (b. 1941), the sports director at KGO in San Francisco, and I ask him how a boy becomes a sportscaster. A week later a postcard comes back. He has filled every white space on it, top to bottom, margin to margin, with tips (such as that I should learn as many sports as possible and I should go to games and record myself doing the call) and he apologizes to me for writing too much! A stranger’s child writes him and he answers with a card jammed full.
I keep thinking about that card. Ernest Becker (1924-1974) gives me the way to read it.
In The Denial of Death (1973) Becker says a man knows he will die and cannot bear the knowledge, so he builds a hero system, a set of roles and values that lets him feel he counts against the dark, that his life adds up to something the grave cannot cancel. Every people hands its young a formula for this kind of heroism. Self-esteem is the feeling that the formula works, that a man is a hero inside the cosmic story his people tell. Take the formula away and he comes apart.
Starkey grows up in Chicago and earns a business degree and a graduate degree at Loyola. He becomes a vice president at Union Bank in San Francisco, then changes course, recording games on his own tape recorder and applying for play-by-play work until Charles O. Finley (1918-1996), owner of the California Golden Seals, hires him to call hockey in 1972. On the bourgeois ladder he wins. Title, salary, the climb. The bank gives him security and nothing to set against death. So he calls games into a recorder, alone, in a living room, practicing a heroism the bank cannot give him, and then he walks off the safe ladder for the booth. A man trades one immortality project for another when the first stops making him feel like a hero.
Here is the broadcaster’s odd place in Becker’s scheme. Most hero systems let a man be the hero of his own story. The broadcaster builds his deathlessness out of other men’s bodies. The athlete’s body fails by thirty-five. The play lasts four seconds and then dies, the way every play dies. What survives is the call. Starkey takes the thing that dies the instant it happens and makes it deathless. He denies death by occupation.
In 1982 Cal returns a kickoff against Stanford with five laterals while the Stanford band pours onto the grass, sure the game has ended. “The band is out on the field,” Starkey says, and his voice breaks, and he says he has never seen anything like it in his life. The kickoff happened once and would have vanished like all kickoffs vanish. A man in a booth fixed it in sound. Now you cannot replay the play without replaying Starkey. He smuggles himself into immortality through the side door of witness. The athletes ran. He stayed.
The year of my postcard is also the year of Lake Placid. Starkey is there for KGO but not assigned to the United States and Soviet hockey game, so he goes as a fan, and as the thing builds he telephones the station, tells his bosses he will risk the job to call the third period live with no authorization, and they let him, and other West Coast stations pick up his feed. To stand present at the great moment and stay silent is, in his hero system, death. He will lose the job before he loses the call. That is a man who believes his own formula.
His trademark is “What a bonanza.” A bonanza is found wealth, the strike no man earned. Luck is holy to him because the witness does not make the moment. He stands present and names it. Presence at grace is the sacred thing, and so he must be there.
Watch the word call do its work in him. He hears a call and leaves the bank. He makes the call that fixes the play. He places the call to KGO that puts him on the air for the miracle. Vocation, broadcast, telephone. One word, one man.
The same word organizes other men and means something foreign in each.
The cloistered monk hears a call, and his summons him away from speech into silence, toward a God who will not be described. He earns his place by disappearing. Starkey’s call pulls him toward the microphone. The monk’s call pulls him away from it. One word, opposite directions.
The floor trader buys a call and means a contract, the right to a rising price, a wager laid on tomorrow. His heroism is to be right about the future and to carry the cost of being wrong. Starkey lays no bet. He describes the thing that already happened. The trader’s call faces forward into what might come. The broadcaster’s call faces the instant that just died.
The auctioneer calls, and he is Starkey’s near cousin, a mouth that turns a room toward a single point and sets a price by speed. But the auctioneer’s chant assigns worth in dollars and ends in a sale. Starkey’s call assigns worth in memory and ends in nothing a man can hold.
The obstetric resident is on call, and his call is the page at three in the morning that drags him to the room where a life begins. He stands at the threshold of a body entering the world, as Starkey stands at the play, but he works in blood and his witness saves a life instead of fixing a moment.
The duck hunter in the tule fog works a call cut from wood and reed, and his call is a lie that brings the living bird down to the gun. The voice summons to kill. Starkey’s voice summons nothing and kills nothing. It comes after the fact and keeps the thing alive.
The revival preacher gives the altar call, and his call summons the sinner down the aisle to be saved before the body fails. His immortality is literal, a soul that outlasts the grave, and the call is the door to it. Starkey promises no soul and no afterlife. His immortality is the cheap and sufficient human kind, a voice lodged in a stranger’s head.
Which returns me to the card. A man who doubts his hero system hoards it. A man who lives inside his hero system hands it down. Becker says a culture survives by handing the young its formula for heroism, and the handing down is the system reproducing itself. Starkey fills a postcard for a boy he will never meet because the boy is continuity, another mouth that might carry the voice forward. He had smuggled himself into permanence by then. He could afford to give the formula away free.
I still have the voice in my head. That was the gift. The play dies. The athlete ages. The card yellows. The call stays.

Posted in Radio | Comments Off on The Joe Starkey Hero System